Christina Aguileraboobs Image

Listen, Yankee!. Stop Cabieses Manuel Donoso Gabriela Mistral

Mr. Barack Hussein Obama, President of the United States
Mr. President, Simon Bolivar wrote on August 5, 1829: "The United States seems destined by Providence to plague America with misery in the name of Freedom." Prophecy confirmed a thousand times today. Liberator's warning came true not only in Latin America and the Caribbean, condemned by their geographical proximity and its enormous wealth to pillage the U.S. suffer and his legions of marines. Since World War II, the voracious predator of the new rule was universal and continues to commit crimes against humanity and call for freedom human rights of their victims. Your country, Mr President, that forged copies inspired by noble patriotic republican principles has become an empire heartless, bloody and rapacious, hated and feared in the world.

wars and invasions, bombings of civilian populations, coups, plots and political assassinations, torture in secret prisons, sabotage, terrorism, propaganda campaigns and money to destabilize governments, fabrications to justify the occupation of countries rich in oil, gas and other minerals, food and medicine blockades to submit the sovereignty and dignity of small and weak nations, and above all, his unbridled spirit of plunder, make U.S. odious symbol of derision in the law of nations. How far is now home of the noble spirit that animated the Declaration of Independence in 1776! The proclamation of Jefferson and his colleagues that "all men are created equal", was lost in the darkness of betrayal. You, sir, is something quite different to the country that the Founding Fathers dreamed. You are the head of an empire that threatens the world with their desperate quest for raw materials and energy resources to feed an economy that recognizes no other limit than the maximum gain. This irresponsibility is driving humanity to hunger and disaster. The contempt of his nation by the laws of nature threatens the existence of the planet and runs environmental solidarity rules that ensure the presence of the human couple on earth. His administration, Mr. President, has continued the U.S. policy making warmongering empire. More than one country, his is a military stronghold. Corroborates the defense budget this year to 553 billion dollars and an additional 117,800 million to support the war in Afghanistan and Iraq.

You do not speak on behalf of the 155 million Americans who want a peaceful world. Much less does it for the thousands of trade unionists and young people these days have moved in Wisconsin, Ohio and other states to protest against laws that reduce pensions and wages. You speak on behalf of U.S. 400 that Michael Moore has said that "with the same amount of wealth that half of all Americans." That fat formidable and indefatigable, who has done their part to spread the reality of U.S., says: "We have delivered our precious democracy to a financial elite. Wall Street, banks and Fortune are the rulers of this republic "(1). This reality-that of capitalism, we live also in Chile. We are about 17 million a mixed population, which, however, discriminates against Indians, brown and black. Our country suffers same distortions that affect you, among other reasons because it strives to imitate. In Chile an elite in power. Its members have enormous fortunes and listed in Forbes' honor roll. Luksic Fontbona widow Iris has 19,200 million dollars. Horst Paulmann, 10,500 million, the Matte, forest owners and power plants, 10,400 million and the President of the Republic, Sebastián Piñera, his fortune increased to 2,400 million last year. This insatiable minority controls the media and private education, which educate the majority of children and young Chileans. Thus achieving the same massive deception that Moore mentioned in his speech Madison: that the poor "vote for the party that protects the rich because 'you could be one day one of them'." The social support of the ruling elite in Chile is a supposed middle class, alienated by consumerism and balances on the credit card. This makes it easy access to automobiles, home appliances, phones, travel and entertainment whose profusion to create the illusion of an egalitarian society. Hiding behind the curtain three and a half million poor and destitute, and nearly 700 000 young people who neither study nor work. A considerable proportion of the population are prisoners of the drug. Chile, as you know, is one of the ten most unequal countries in the world. As you can see, Mr. President, Chile will feel at home. In a way, be perceived if the thick wall of security permits, "our country is a crude imitation of you. But you are the rule and we the colony. The economic and social model imposed on us by the military state terrorism and businessmen in league with multinational corporations, was the top prize of U.S. intervention. The oligarchy that helped spark the coup is the same as that now governs the country. It has not stopped it at any time for almost 40 years. For it has been valid regardless of military and political right and center-"left." The latter ruled for 20 years and not even ruffled the neoliberal model. By contrast, ended up transferring to the private sector of what remained in the public area. That

riffraff, Mr. President, are your friends in Chile. Be careful with them. It is unfortunate, Mr. President, you traverse the same winding road that already had their predecessors. Has not corrected the treacherous policy toward Cuba that led the ten past presidents. The blockade of the island, you know, is an unjust arbitrariness that violates the human rights of the Cuban people. It says United Nations every year, not that his country is aware of it. This is an insult and an affront to Latin America and the Caribbean because it tramples the sovereignty of a sister nation. Moreover, his government has been deaf to the global call for freedom for five Cuban prisoners in U.S. defendants to prevent terrorist actions against Cuba was brewing. The belligerent attitude of his government in Venezuela is another embarrassing fact of imperial policy. His attempts to destabilize the government of President Hugo Chavez repeated the same pattern of foreign intervention that lived in Chile in 1973 and Honduras in 2009. You seem not to understand that in Latin America and the Caribbean has been reborn a current social and political demand participatory democracy, justice and equality. It is a movement of people tired of fictions democratic to the extent of oligarchic interests. His upper-demand, is always unity and integration of Latin America and the Caribbean.

That's what Hugo Chavez is the Venezuelan people and the poor and excluded the continent. The Bolivarian Revolution has a line of continuity of two centuries the Latin American and Caribbean political history. Comes from the liberators who challenged and defeated the colonial power, including our Bernardo O'Higgins proclaimed "better to die standing than live on your knees." That was the fighting spirit of the chiefs and indigenous and mestizo soldiers early struggles for independence. It's the same spirit that was reborn in Fidel Castro and Salvador Allende, and now runs through the plains of Venezuela and the jungles and mountains of Ecuador and Bolivia. In 1960 a great American, the sociologist C. Wright Mills, Listen Yankee wrote. The Cuban Revolution. It was an attempt to understand U.S. this historic event. But the U.S. did not listen. Would you pay attention to brave Americans like Noam Chomsky, James Petras, Michael Moore and many other intellectuals, artists, filmmakers, religious ministers, scientists, trade unionists, etc., Which honestly address his nation awakens to the reality. If you attend these voices, understand why the classic shouting "Yankee go home "the American president will continue listening to the doomsday of imperialism. Yours sincerely, Manuel Cabieses

DONOSO is Director of "Punto Final"

(1) Michael Moore speech in Madison, Wisconsin, 5/3/2011.

(Published in "Punto Final", Issue No. 729, March 18, 2011)
a

Similar Denise Milani

Hernán Soto
Mistral was in many ways a forward to changes and approaches that now seem natural indispensable and often urgent. Essential Christian spirituality was defined as a supporter of transformations profound: the need for land reform, real Americanism, respect for indigenous people and mestizos, the love of children and the oppressed. Issue was concerned about the education and culture to serve the people.

should try to know her better, beyond convention and darkness.

Their sense of belonging to the pop world was undeniable. In a letter to a Mexican friend confided: "... I owe to the generous protection aristocracy: its defense when she campaigned against my appointment to a high school, but the class in which I am, I hope that the more I love and heart is the working class. "

had a clear opinion about the place that should be of recognized workers in society. When in 1925 he was invited to participate in the National Women's Council conditioned its acceptance tasty that it involved the workers' societies, so that they reflect the reality of social classes in Chile: "The working class can not be less than half representatives at a meeting either, covering half our territory, as our guts and bones. The other classes are a kind of golden skin that covers it. "

A stance that added other elements of identity that were completed, as the essential quality of villagers, the small valley cut in the aridity of the hills where he was born and spent his early years, near La Serena. "We the people of this area of \u200b\u200bElqui, miners or farmers at the same time. In the valley, the man took upon himself the mine, because the mountains surrounding us everywhere and no way to ignore it: the woman worked in the valley. Before feminism village and legal reforms, fifty years before, we've been there in a mountain cliffs of the work of women become customary. Water girl I've seen women at midnight in our clear night, the vineyard and the orchard, I have seen him do completely the harvest, I have worked with them in the so-called 'stripping peach 'before the machine stoner; have done their syrups, its Uvat and endless sweets taken from the beautiful English family business. "

Martí footprint in

Through the eyes and the memory of his village, Gabriela could imagine and try to understand the world. His deep roots in Latin America was beyond particularism and political definitions. Speaking to the board of the Pan American Union in Washington, in 1946, shortly after "Stockholm that," as sometimes to refer to the Nobel Prize, said, "I am not a patriot nor a Pan Am drugging with greatness of continent. I've known him almost entirely from Canada to Tierra del Fuego, I have eaten at the best and the worst tables I have scattered in the flesh itself a kind of continental limo. And I dare say, without fear of looking like a phenomenon, poverty in Central America as important as the Indian fueguino and black nudity of any tropical song to me as tropical burning them. " Gabriela

followed the trail of José Martí in Our America and the vision of Francisco Bilbao, who saw the future of Latin America as a land of promise for humanity united, democratic and committed to the ideals liberators. Gabriela claimed authenticity and not copy, imitation and originality and not see that one of the main risks was in the U.S.. Ardently supported the struggle against the American invaders Sandino of Nicaragua and even called the young Latin Americans to defend with arms the hopeless cause for the infinite disproportion between the adversaries, which Sandino and his "crazy little army" had only with his courage to fight for dignity and justice.

In 1922, Gabriela published The cry, which can be viewed as a compendium of ideas in Latin America, which imagines the continent as a great hope: "America and only America. What intoxication such a future, What future, what vast kingdom for greater freedom and excellence! ". The overwhelmed by financial and industrial power the United States, for its power and influence. It is not derived from a hatred of Americans but rather a reproach to our own carelessness and weakness. "I hate the Yankee? No! We are winning, we are rolling our fault, our languor torrid our Indian fatalism. We are breaking apart at the hands of some of its virtues and vices of our race. Why do you hate them? We hate what in us makes us vulnerable to the steel pin and gold to his will and his wealth. " When finished, call to direct all activities towards the unification of America, motivated by "the language that God gave him and the pain that gives the North."

Latin American Unity

His belief in the need and urgency for the unity of Latin America has not abandoned her. And it was more specific: "We must unify our homelands in the interior, through an education that is transmuted into national consciousness and distribution of welfare that we become absolute balance, and we must unite our countries into a rhythm addressed a Pythagorean bit, thanks to which these twenty areas without shock move freely and also works a beauty ... We ambition is still obscure and confusing, but that comes rolling down the stream from the Platonic archetypes through feverish face and suffered from Bolivar where we utopia come true square edge. "

From adolescence, Gabriela Mistral had social concerns that were heightened by reading, research and contact with the reality of public education. After the stay in Mexico was decisive. Joaquín Edwards Bello remembers in Paris on official business, "absorbed dreamed of democracy, land distribution, with the fate of Puerto Rico and Nicaragua." And just one of the texts to support the exploits of Sandino, Gabriela wrote: "... convincing me that I walk by America giddy days when women say no, but children also have to have to talk politics, because it would be (evil policy) the delivery of the wealth of our peoples The estates of clenched fists that prevents saving a decent and division of the land, the old school does not give jobs to poor children and gives the average professional specialty, the old pure sour Jacobinism that denies freedom of religion who know civilized countries, foreign influences and with absolute shamelessness naked before our rulers. "

His stay in Mexico, among 1922 and 1924, invited by the Minister of Education, Jose Vasconcelos, and where he returned many times, changed his life. The distribution of land became a permanent concerns. Landlordism was understood that a central problem for Latin America, long before it was put in the center of the political agenda. In 1954, when he came second and last time in Chile, asked about the progress of land reform, without knowing (or knowing) that was not among the concerns of the government headed by Carlos Ibanez del Campo. In Mexico also was an increased awareness of the situation to the detriment of indigenous and mestizo character of the continent, stresses in his work, from a sort of revelation that appears on their known lines: "In the field of Mitla, a day of cicadas, the sun, run / I bent down a well and wine / an Indian to hold me over water / and my head as a result was within his palms. / drank what I drank / was your face with my face / and in a flash I knew / meat Mitla be my caste. " In the "Hymns" of his book Tala has been even a replacement of the Judeo-Christian roots of his work by Indian mysticism, which are the Sun, the Earth Cordillera and divinities. Report of fascism



Gabriela and was twenty-six When the First World War in Europe, a previously unimaginable carnage. Lived after the time of the great revolutionary wave that began in 1917 Russian revolution, the capitalist counter-marked by fascism in Italy, Portugal and Romania, since early 1930, the unstoppable rise of Hitler and the Nazis in Germany. Gabriela Mistral was among the first who warned the fascist danger. At some point refused to be consul in an Italian city while Mussolini ruled. In the English civil war supported the Republican cause and donated to the Basque children, displaced by the attack of the fascists, the copyright of his book Tala. In a Paul eulogy of Torriente, Cuban communist youth volunteer in the English Republican troops, killed in combat, which emphasizes the heroism and generosity, and concluded that his death be in vain "if this satanic world iron beast color color pardinegro they want us dissolves like a nightmare before curdling. " Franco detested and never again set foot on English soil. Those were times of social upheaval and political monster that spread to Asia and Africa and not left unscathed in Latin America.

World War II, the Holocaust, concentration camps and the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki were aware of the term of an era, and the dawning of new hope and the threat of enormous danger. After the war, the cause of peace became crucial. The threat of a nuclear attack on the Soviet Union by the United States became a real threat denounced by intellectuals, scientists and artists who accused Western propaganda tools of the communism. Gabriela Mistral contributed to "curse word", a text that was known throughout the world: "There are words that speak louder suppressed precisely because of the flushing and exile and the 'peace' is jumping to the people who are deaf or distracted because after all, Christians astray from all branches, from Catholic to Quaker soon have to remember as the ravings of more insistent that the word in the Gospels is it precisely that word crossed out in the newspapers, the word stuck in a corner, this monosyllable us is barred like a dirty word. Is the word for excellence and that, repeatedly, a presence in the sacred Scriptures as an obsession. We must continue vocéandola day to day, so that some of the divine commission afloat even as a poor cork on the prevailing paganism ... Digásmola each day where we are, where we go, until it takes the body and create a 'peace activism 'which fill the air thick and dirty and be cleansed. "

"A huge revolutionary"

Gabriela was, wrote the painter Roberto Matta, "a huge revolution in the human sense of the term." It was not Marxist or less anarchist, but did not object to the profound transformations. Much praised highly critical of communism and others, such as anti-religious policy and the measures that threatened the family. He denounced the Soviet invasion of Finland in 1939 and supported the peace policy of the USSR during the second postwar period. Likewise rejected the anti-Communist policy of Gonzalez Videla in Chile.

Was close to the main Social Christian leaders such as Eduardo Frei and Radomiro Tomic, who was a friend and godmother, but it is doubtful that had been defined as a Democrat. She wished a church to serve the poor and once was defined as an individual community, meaning he was not opposed to the collective work and community and an equitable distribution of wealth with respect immovable by the individual, their uniqueness and their right to govern its decisions. He wanted, he asserted, to keep "the greatest amount of individuality in a collectivist rule." Its rationale was basically ethical and Christian, in a unique religious, Catholic initially, then Buddhist and theosophical leanings, to return to Catholicism marked by the permanent initial reading of the Bible and admiration for St. Francis of Assisi. As Clotaire Blest, in his last days Gabriela was Secular Franciscan Order Minor.

reflection of Gabriela Mistral, for over sixty years on the youth deserves to be remembered: "Look for today's youth about these things: a social order in which class differences do not continue to correspond to the name and money but the proven ability of the trade or profession, ie the actual values. All of them want to eliminate the scourge of poverty that has been blight on the noble face of the Latin. Everyone wants that the work is not a matter of chance and pain, disordered chance of overexertion. And if you wanted to see on these youths the crust of a crass materialism which did not show the above, the truth is that she is looking for a new spirituality. "
Source: http://www.elclarin.cl/web/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=623:gabriela-mistral-rebelde-sin-fronteras&catid=5:cultura-y-espectaculos & ; Itemid = 6

High Heels & Big Boobs

rebel without borders "nuclear power comes to Chile? WHEN THE BLACK GOLD

Codelco begins producing uranium mine experimentally in Radomiro Tomic
A plant of the Chilean Nuclear Energy Commission was put into operation and began mineral produce this energy in a pilot scheme to assess its commercial viability. With the end of the Cold War, nuclear power plants began to procure the U.S. military stocks and Russia, an offer that is ending. The investment is 1,300 million dollars.

Zanelli report, the committee of scientists who studied the nuclear option during the previous government, said it clearly: "Given the complex national and global energy scenario, it is necessary to position the security of electricity supply as a strategic national goal to achieve higher levels of development. In the case of Chile, this requires greater autonomy in energy supply, which is achieved through diversification, which play a relevant role NCRE, nuclear energy and energy efficiency. "

these lines and also in the commercial possibilities, the Chilean Nuclear Energy Commission (CCHEN) and Codelco develop an ambitious program to produce uranium in Chile. The information was disclosed to the journal Professional Copper by engineer Gonzalo Torres, head of the Department of Nuclear Materials CCHEN, who is in charge of the project. Torres was executive director of the institution from 1997 to 2001 and Chief Scientist at the Permanent Mission of Chile to the International Atomic Energy Agency.

The specialist explained that the agreement came "in the interest of Codelco Norte to recover other metals apart from copper, as byproducts. This collaboration, "he says dates back to late in the '70s, when in 1979 she was received in Chuquicamata an experimental separation of uranium. Until 80 CCHEN exploration program deployed a radioactive resources in the country, and among them were evaluated the presence of uranium associated with copper. In many areas where uranium anomalies were detected, was associated with copper. "

Torres says the project aims to "explore the technical potential of separating uranium in some forms of presentation of the mineral, either in the heap leach copper (PLS) and in gravel or in mines. An agreement was signed, the areas were divided in geology, metallurgy and chemical analysis, "he says. Yellow Cake



The first stage of this chemical process metallurgy, Torres emphasizes, "was positive and there was a laboratory process optimal hydrometallurgical separation of uranium. This began in 2008 and ended in 2009. Completed this phase, which is complemented by chemical analysis of that solution to examine the presence of initial uranium, then comes the process of uranium mining. Now moved into a second phase in the metallurgy. This gives rise to a scaling a pilot. " Thus, the CCHEN moved its plant equipment to the mine Lo Aguirre Radomiro Tomic (RT).

"The main objective of this plant-specific information is what proportion of the presence of uranium in the currents of the PLS Radomiro Tomic and determine the parameters of separation," he says.

Torres said there validating the separation process and efficiency, then measure and evaluate an industrial scale from the standpoint of the technical-economic feasibility of going to a larger scale, he says.

"This second phase will operate ten months. Is funded through a contribution of U.S. $ 1,300 million Codelco. We provide the technical infrastructure and expertise, "he says.

"The plant consists of a battery cell solvent extraction and ion exchange column, reservoir, ponds and collection of fluid handling and finally where we receive a deposit of uranium oxide, which is a dry powder, yellow, in the jargon is called "Yellow Cake". We are soon to start getting a few kilos of Yellow Cake in a short time, in about a month and get some kilos of material, "he said.

To be profitable for Codelco and any company in the world, the exploitation of uranium must be about a hundred tons.

"Uranium is alone or in combination with other minerals. In Chile is not only linked to copper but there are other geological formations without copper, rare earths. Is diverse as the presence of uranium. We believe that there may be a specific mining uranium, "poses.

Chile hundred places where uranium

The CCHEN did in the '70s "an exploration of a small part of the territory. Then realized around 100 prospects interesting for uranium. It was a basic survey, which covered about 7% of the territory, a letter was forecast, which realizes various locations throughout Chile, not only in the north but also in central and south, where there presence of uranium. In Chile there is uranium, we must explore and quantify and assess their potential removal from the economic point of view. "

"The world today consumes about 68 thousand tons per year of uranium and intensive growth is projected over the next 20 years. It must be said that nuclear power generation, fuel price is very low in cost. For that reason we can not say that the higher price uranium, higher prices for electricity. Fuel represents a small percentage, not exceeding 15% in electricity generation, unlike other fuels. This aroused interest everywhere and therefore global action to encourage the exploration of uranium, "he says.

"nuclear power reactors in the world have fed uranium, which comes from fields in operation in a few countries in the world: Canada, Australia, Gabon and Russia are major producers of uranium. Then along with the existing production, also re-destination of uranium from U.S. military arsenals and Russia. These stocks are military running out and demand has begun to grow, both by existing reactors, as new parts of the world, "he said.

"On average a nuclear power plant consumes about 80 to 100 tons of uranium a year. Argentine plants are in that range. A country with 300 thousand tons of uranium has to supply a strong nuclear program for over 100 years. We estimate that tens of thousands of tons of uranium, but this checking is needed. We speculate that uranium resources are more than enough in Chile to support a nuclear program with several plants. A nuclear program is held in one central one. "

nuclear fuel cycle

Stage 1. Uranium mining. Extraction and separation of mineral mining under conventional procedures.
Step 2. Concentration. Production of concentrated natural uranium ore conversion in uranate ammonium (Yellow Cake).
Stage 3. Conversion and enrichment: at this stage uranium concentrate is purified and converted into uranium hexafluoride. Then this product is subjected to an enrichment process to increase production. The result is enriched uranium oxide.
Stage 4. Manufacture of fuel elements. At this stage the uranium oxide is treated to obtain ceramic fuel pellets, which are placed in bars, then they are placed in a frame that contains a given number of such bars. This final structure is called "the fuel."
Stage 5. Use of nuclear fuel: The fuel elements are introduced into the reactor core to generate nuclear fission. Once the life of a fuel has stopped, they are stored temporarily in the same facilities that house the reactor.
Stage 6. Storage of waste: Waste produced are conditioned to become a solid mass, stable and durable. Then placed in containers specially designed to withstand storage for decades or hundreds of years.

From: www.radio.uchile.cl

Gay Cruise Spots Columbia

was decisive in the national security of the imperial power.

By Hector Vega.
World War II in many respects was an oil war. Lacking sufficient supplies in its imperialist expansion, Germany turned to oil sources in the Caucasus and Japan invaded Indonesia. When the nationalization of Iranian oil industry [1951], the British government organized a general and in 1953 the CIA carried out a coup against Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh.

In 1956, when Gamal Abdel Nasser nationalized the Suez Canal, controlled a key passage in the transport of oil to the West, France England and Israel invaded the Sinai and the Gaza Strip. In the early '70s in their fight for control of oil and after the convertibility of the dollar and the successive devaluations of 1971 and 1973, OPEC countries as a result of the war [October 1973 Yom Kippur ] declared an oil embargo which raised oil prices by more than 250%.
After Angola's independence in 1975, the CIA together with separatist movements and the multinational Chevron-Texaco oil plotted to take over the enclave of Cabinda, which currently represents almost 80% of Angola's oil revenues, in addition to manganese resources , gold diamonds.

During the Vietnam War was the Mobil off-shore exploration [that territory then known as South Viet-Nam], concession renewed three decades later, height of irony, without positive results, "in Blue Dragon 280 km., Mekong Delta. Indonesia occupying power in East Timor demanded interest on significant hydrocarbon reserves in conjunction with Australia. Recurring conflict in the Spratley Islands, whose oil reserves were claimed by China and Vietnam.

The aftermath of the oil wars have left a trail of victims. Suffice it to cite the statistics of the Gulf War in 1991 to 1.5 million direct death toll in the clashes, in addition to civilians affected by the economic sanctions imposed on Iraq. War in Iraq [March 2003] recorded a balance of 655,000 Iraqis dead, 4.7 million refugees and 5 million Iraqi children orphaned. Experience today resumed operations in the Maghreb and Libya with unpredictable repercussions in the political developments in the region. Nothing has been excluded in these preparations, even the hackneyed invocation of the existence of weapons of mass destruction that Gaddafi would be ready to use against his people [See statements of former Arab League Ambassador Clovis Maksoud and former British Prime Minister John Major]. Note that the General Staff of the Russian Federation made known to the international press that "satellite images taken from space suggest that the alleged air attack that took place on 22 February on Benghazi and Tripoli, were a device used as a pretext for military intervention "humanitarian". "
Obama's remarks, Cameron, Sarkozy, Zapatero and others, prepared a scenario of intervention and coup in Libya, calling for a no-fly zone, suggesting several possible military options generated from NATO. Since March 2, the U.S. Senate voted unanimously to impose an exclusion zone aérea sobre Libia. A lo cual se agrega el llamado de cuarenta neoconservadores en carta al presidente Obama para que desarrolle una inmediata acción militar para derrocar a Kadafi.
La prensa internacional citaba la opinión del general Mattis, Jefe del Comando Central de EEUU que ante el Comité de Servicios Armados del Senado calificaba la zona de exclusión aérea como una operación militar. Pues además sería necesario bombardear las defensas aéreas [misiles tierra-aire] de Libia mediante ataques aéreos lanzados desde bases de EEUU en el sur de Italia.
En lo concreto, un poderoso contingente militar dispuesto a intervenir en una eventual invasión se sitúa frente a las costas de Libia. Se trata de una fuerza Naval 6 countries-Germany, England, USA, Canada, France and Italy, composed of 8 battleships and 2 carriers [including the nuclear aircraft carrier, USS Enterprise], a fleet of Cobra helicopters and military aircraft.
Libya: an unsuccessful bid
industrial powers understood that national security was linked to authoritarian regimes that guaranteed the stability and status quo. Western democracy was said by the silent change, worse, confused modernity access to [health, education, housing ...] that Arab autocrats offered the privileged segment of the population, with the possibility of participation vast majority of the population.

From the outside, Europe, South America, North America, Asia, motley group of self-proclaimed governments for change, mistook their own ideas of democracy with which the Arab people resented in their experience of exclusion, hunger and misery.

Few bothered to understand what was happening in Libya. Political reality based on tribal land away from the traditional Western idea of \u200b\u200bnation-state [the time of the Treaty of Utrecht in Europe, 1713] political practice based on tribal ties from which you build the political organization. Historically
Libya, was part of Roman and Byzantine empires before falling under the hegemony of Arab power and civilization. After the Second World War and while under a British protectorate in fact, the UN handed over power to the sheikh of the tribe and Emir Sanusi of Cyrenaica: Sidi Idris, who proclaimed the reigning monarchy in the name of Idris I. Qaddafi ousted King in 1969 under the inspiration of the pan-Arab and socialist revolution of Gamal Abdel Nasser. It is precisely the Sanusi tribe that started the revolt in Benghazi [province of Cyrenaica] under the flag of the monarchy. Moreover, it is Mohammed Al Sanusi, nephew Idris, Libya's self-proclaimed prince in exile who claims to support "the heroes of the popular uprising" against the Qaddafi regime whom he calls "murderer of his people." Libya
today lives a tribal fight, where an intervention of Western powers will be welded to the price of its sovereignty as has been aligned with a tribe, an emirate, the Benghazi, which means to rule the rest of the territory under its aegis. There will arise a new deal for the extraction of "black gold" suitable for local corporations and a privileged and wealthy elite.
dominant Western powers never saw what was brewing in the Middle East, namely a broad social front, driven by the revolution communications, isolated in his imaginary of participation than the autocrats were willing to concede. When weaving transnational agreements with foreign governments and ruling political class has lost legitimacy because people understood that such arrangements were at the origin of its fundamental weaknesses.
The former colonial powers have believed reissuing old practices and commitments. A bizarre situation recently experienced Cameron's Conservative government when he dispatched an envoy of the Foreign Office to find out "what might be useful" to the interim government of Benghazi. The mission ended in a fiasco for even was received by the Libyan National Transition Council, to be reshipped with SAS special forces who accompanied her, after confiscation of their firearms. Failure that the British foreign minister should explain to the House of Commons.
Five new political realities in the Middle East
Five new political power than the agreements signed with the privileged classes and the imperialist powers which the latter attempted to perpetuate himself in power. Understood too late that the people who came to demonstrate and elections were not enough for what it was today, was to exercise power. Since the beginning of every revolution, and a path of no return, called the maximum, without compromise. It demanded nothing less than full power. Time will tell how to take this political exercise proclaimed from the streets of the city. In any case we can be sure will never be the same in the past.
statements to the media and messages in cyberspace the second new reality show namely awareness of complicity with transnational corporations, foreign governments and local politicians. Today is the voice that circulates in the nations of the Middle East and North Africa and even in closed regimes such as Saudi Arabia's absolute royalty. The claim is not only the removal but there are already cases of corrupt politicians taken to court to answer for illicit enrichment and arbitrariness to the population.
A third point is the reality of communication networks is no longer the exclusive management of radio stations and television officials. Today the public has taken possession of time and space: control communication.
Derived from this is still a fourth point. When the local media stopped being extended to countries and continents. The street called expanded the universe in real time, is transferred back to proposals and calls to action. He felt the call to solidarity and incentives to action. Time will tell how many of these calls were due urgent realities. In short, communications, social impact, they replaced the power of weapons.
Finally, a fifth item related to social development and the environment. The environment became part of social reality and consciousness of the people directly related to large infrastructure works and social development. Suffice it to quote the great artificial river through a pipeline network of over 4,500 kilometers of groundwater supplies to Libya. Water resource estimates provide water to that country for four years in 1800 [See Tajeldine Laila. "Libya, intervention, division or unit." Aporrea.org. Venezuela, 24/02/2011]. Commenting on these resources Fidel Castro wrote "Under this desert was a vast and deep water sea fossils. I felt when I met an experimental area of \u200b\u200bcrops, those waters in the future, would be more valuable than oil "[See" The War of NATO inevitable. " Part II. 02/03/1911. www.fortinmapocho.com]
of how political practice changed the battlefield
What happens in war is not independent of what happens in politics. Neither Kadafi, nor the opposition National Council of Transition Libyan have the ability to decide the situation in the field of battle. The opposing forces in a country of over 1 million km2 700 000 530 000 6 million inhabitants, ie 3.1 inhabitants per square kilometer, village especially in the coastal oil and gas facilities within never surpassed in the beginning Brega fighting in the past thousand armed fighters, and add that these were not decisive support in weapons and personnel. Over the day the fighting forces and increased government pressure which endangered not only the oil and gas supply in Benghazi, but also the control of Ras Lanuf [west of Brega, now in flames after be achieved storage crude oil terminal Es Sider]. Between 5 and 7 March, the government consolidated its position in Ras Lanuf and increased pressure on Brega. Declarations of war correspondents spoke of a decline in the enthusiasm of Brega defenders who were attacked by much higher means which count. Moreover, the army reportedly launched an offensive in Az Zawiyah, a little less than 40 miles west of Tripoli that would already be in possession of government forces.
no space force projection to ground or vice-versa, the opposition understands its limitations and the inability to short-term and current means of achieving a final consolidation in the field. Thus, refusing to foreign forces in the territory, the Libyan National Transitional Council has urged the countries of NATO's statement-fly zone to prevent any attacks by the Air Force Kadafi. With this demand, Benghazi not see or will not see the implications of military intervention in the conflict that has military exclusion zone. In fact, it is a complex operation involving naval, aircraft, AWACS planes, all of this if it has the mandate of the Security Council and the effective support of the countries of the NATO pact. Agreement so far denied China and Russia.
In the past U.S. interventions in Korea Viet-Nam, the air space Kosobo, Iraq twice, Afghanistan, have meant facing the public a significant cost to governments of the Empire. Are the constraints that Obama, a weak president, captive, like all American presidents of transnational arms control and high finance, is not willing to take a year into the campaign the mercy of a defeat their struggle for a new presidential term [01/20/2010 to 01/20/2012].
In short, neither the Council nor Gaddafi Libyan National Transitional Benghazi, Western governments can not rely entirely control the political game surrounding the combat operations.
Western governments, European and American public understand that their views are not willing to embark on warlike adventures, so the war games and operational planning staffs favor options to the city, people and computer networks, are combat elements unpredictable and unmanageable from a potential hub.
The degree of freedom in these conjectures is given by an external force, assuming low demand in Benghazi, an option until the same has been rejected. Reduced civil war
operations of internal forces, it is clear that the center of gravity of the two forces at work [in the sense Clausewitz's] moves into the realm of political support from the population. Lost balance in this area, the operational constraints in terms of weapons, vehicles, communications hardware, supplies .... And loyalties, imply that the returns policy on track and little or nothing left for foreign military intervention.
In the field of international calls Kadafi has requested the site visit [fact-finding mission] of delegations of the United Nations and Arab League. In his recent remarks have included acceptance of a mission in France without limitation information in their field visits.
political realities and the weapons are
In conclusion, the political reality prevails over the logic of the battlefield. This plays to all: the forces of Qaddafi, the Libyan National Council of Transition and the Western powers in calling for his ouster. Add that if it were only heading to Kadafi the solution to be considered as easy and almost banal.
Several policy options open in the solution of the conflict. All within a negotiation process between parties. One could be in the field presence of the Arab League as the only bargaining power or in conjunction with a UN delegation. Another, complementary, diplomacy exercised by President Chávez supported Cuba and Nicaragua. None of these proposals
emergency-cake facade or a political edifice built by an agreement between tribes that no longer exists, can forget the words of the source of power Kadafi, namely, negotiation between tribes. Latter fundamental element and the base of the problem. Limited to discuss the emergency [or the first, ie the cease-fire, evacuation of refugees and humanitarian aid] is placed on this side of the realities that people have demonstrated in the streets. I'm not saying the first thing is not the first, just say that we must consider the political element is central and that the origin of the power of Kadafi, namely the founding agreement between tribes.
In Libya recognizes the existence of 140 tribes of which only 30 dominate the political landscape [statistics produced by A. Faraj Najm, historian Libyan] which concentrate their influence in the urban centers of Tripoli and Benghazi. According
Hanspeter Mattes, the German Institute of Global Studies, an expert on Libya, "the coming to power of Muammar Gaddafi in 1969 became an alliance of Qaddafi's own tribe [the Qadhadhifa] with Warfalla and Maqarha, who won seats Key in the security field, ie in the armed forces, police and intelligence services. This ensured their control. "
In essence, and to understand political processes underway in Libya, Gaddafi develops the concept of tribe. Which is presented as a "social school in which all grow by absorbing the high ideals that end up setting the standard of living behavior. The tribe is an "umbrella" natural social security itself. " For Kadafi the security granted by the tribe is "collective protection in the form of adjustment, revenge and defense." This is based on the bond of blood which is the sublime form of the assignment. Blood and attachment are the core of the tribe which is ultimately the "physical and unique social unit" that ties of blood is in short the "unity original "[See Green Paper].
can not deny the existence of other ideas about the problem. One, discussed by Professor Moncef Uanna Tunis University, author of Military elites and modernization of Libya contemporary [2009] thinks that "it is quite possible that his own tribe [gadafa] force him to relinquish power, because the longer the war lasts, the worse they suffer reprisals. " In his opinion, and the appointment of Gaddafi's Green Book itself is reinforced, "the tribal revenge is still the rule." "Therefore," adding that it "could push him into exile in Venezuela, which is still an option" [Or other] directly settled. " Others see a split Libya and Somalia hazy destination. [1]
But not in vain rebel movements have emerged in societies of the Middle East and there are ongoing civil war. Thus the five Middle Eastern political realities mentioned above play an important role. Realities that necessarily affect negotiators.
The first challenge is that the path of negotiation goes beyond the traditional ways of diplomacy. For what is at stake are secular institutions of society and the passage to wrenching changes in tradition. And that does not manage even on a settlement between parties, foreign leaders.
In fact the leaders, that for decades the negotiators have understood any, notice to State level, have changed. No longer exist. This is most noticeable in the case of Latin American leaders at some point were related to the Arab world. Also a major fact: social actors are different.
How to understand the exercise of power claimed in the street but in the context of new social actors to claim their place since the occupation, profession, university, or circumstantial traditional jobs, in order from the consciousness of the farm where it is mixed nationalism with the predominance of social control on new forms of government?
Moreover, in these days in the Arab world have seen the presence of women on the streets. Women in traditional dress, niqab or burqa traditional megaphones to the crowd seeking information. That did not start yesterday or the day before yesterday. It is simply a social reality that has always existed in Islamic societies profoundly unknown to the Western world.
bargaining behind the street, to cliques reserved, no longer possible under the reality of new forms of communication and social dynamics, encouraged by these new social actors.
was born a new form of legitimacy to fight to impose a reality of the tribe in a still traditional society. Thus, neither the Western powers, nor any negotiators have the same effect, prior to today's social movements born in the Middle East. In a sense the new Libya and why not say it, the new societies of the Middle East result from the legitimacy of the practice of arms which the people confronted the police and repression of the praetorian guards, but very fundamentally new political convictions are welded to the arms and add in the case of Libya, under the sign of the negotiation of the tribes.

Chris Kattan John Goodman

what to do in Libya? A view from Latin America. Atilio Boron

We must not abandon our brothers The unexpected rebellion
Arabs in the Arab world took everyone by surprise. The satrapies the Maghreb and the Middle East were as stunned as their imperial masters by hatching which originated in an incident relativamete marginal, beyond the terrible and painful it was at the individual level: the self-immolation in the town of Sidi Bouzid, Tunisia, Muhammad Al Bouazizi, a college graduate of twenty-six years was not working and decided to surrender to the flames because the police prevented him from selling fruit and vegetables on the street. His family needed his help and Al Bouazizi, a poor boy would not become one in a long line of young unemployed in their country or to migrate to Europe by any means. The terrible slaughter of their protest was the spark that ignited the dry prairie of a region known for the opulence of the secular ruling oligarchies and misery of the masses. Or, in the words of Eduardo Galeano always beautiful, which ignited "the beautiful flame of freedom" that ignited the Arab world and imperialism is on tenterhooks, to continue with fiery metaphors as appropriate for the times. (1)

Rise of the Arab peoples also made it awkward position to experts, analysts and journalists. Mercilessly his bared charlatanism, and role of manipulators of public opinion in the service of capital. A magazine as much experience as The Economist, for example, was unable to anticipate, in its latest issue last year dedicated to presenting the forecasts and what was coming for 2011, the events that would stir a few weeks later the Arab world - and, by extension, the global geopolitical balance, to the ground. This failure repeats yet again the inability of conventional wisdom to predict the great events of our time. Political science was boquiaberta before the fall of the Berlin Wall and, more recently, the Queen herself Inglaterra le preguntó a un selecto núcleo de economistas británicos cómo fue posible que nadie hubiera sido capaz de pronosticar la actual crisis general del capitalismo.Sumidos en el estupor ante tan inesperada pregunta, formulada en lo que se suponía sería una serena velada meramente protocolar, los interpelados se limitaron a solicitar, atónitos ante el reproche, un plazo de seis meses para revisar su instrumental analítico e informarle a Su Majestad las razones por de tan deplorable desempeño profesional.(2)



El impacto sobre América Latina



No es casual, entonces, que los acontecimientos del mundo árabe hayan sumido en la confusión a buena parte Latin American left. Daniel Ortega unqualified support to Qaddafi, the president of the Bolivarian Republic of Venezuela, Hugo Chávez, in turn, filed a friend of the ruling but certainly clear that this does not mean, in their own words, "I am in favor or applaud any decision made by a friend of mine anywhere in the world. "Moreover, he continued," We support the government of Libya, Libya's independence. "(3) In their statements Chavez noted the early warning issued by Fidel as soon Libyan crisis erupted: this could be used to justify a "humanitarian intervention" in U.S. and its European allies under the umbrella of NATO, to take over the Libyan oil and gas. But no way this wise warning from the leader of the Cuban revolution could lead to an unqualified endorsement to the regime of Gaddafi. Chavez did not, but it did Ortega. As expected, the blatant manipulation of the media with which the imperialists attack the leftist governments of our region twisted the meaning of the words of Chávez and Fidel making them appear complicit in a government that was unloading bullets on his own people. (4)



In an illuminating article published few days ago in Rebellion Alba Allende Alma Rico and argued persuasively that an erroneous positioning of the Latin American left-and especially the governments of Venezuela and Cuba in the current situation of the Arab world can produce at least three terrible effects: breaking ties with the Arab people's movements , giving legitimacy to the accusations against Venezuela and Cuba and 'represtigiar' severely damaged the democratic discourse of imperialism. A triumph, no doubt, to the imperialist interests in the region. "(5) Hence the gravity of the situation, which requires travel a narrow path flanked by two tremendous depths: one, of pandering to U.S. imperialism and its European partners and facilitate their overt plans to snatch the Libyans its oil, the other out to support an anti-colonialist regime and having been left in its origins, as it was, for example, APRA in Peru-in the last two decades, unscrupulous subordinated to imperialist capital and embraced and implemented, without question, the fateful Washington Consensus policies and precepts of the "war on terror" instituted by George W. Bush.



The Arab World: revolt, revolution, conspiracy?



not stop we needed to explain why be opposed to the option unmitigated interventionist United States and its European partenaires. Now, however, what the arguments to prevent that correct and non-negotiable stance unfortunately leads to an endorsement of a regime against which it has been up in arms most of the population. Some argue that what is happening in Libya is just the "contagion effect" of what happened in Tunisia and Egypt and there are no fundamental reasons that justify the popular uprising. Starting should remember two things: that revolutions are dialectical processes and not metaphysical or lightning events that are downloaded on a clear day. In the genesis of the French revolution is a riot resulted in a bakery near the Bastille. We know what happened next. Second, inevitably, the revolutionary processes are contagious. That is what history teaches. Remember if you do not what happened with the revolutions of independence in Latin America, two centuries ago, or 1848 and which took place also in Europe in the aftermath of the First World War and the outbreak of the Russian Revolution February 1917. But if in some places these processes on and in another it was not because the spread does not operate in a vacuum socio-economic and political, but that depends primarily on internal conditions of each country. (6) If the 1848 revolution triumphed in France but not in the UK was because at first the development of class struggle created the internal conditions to put an abrupt end to the restoration of the monarchy of Orleanist, while none of that happening across the Channel, in the same historical juncture, without any shock could host two political refugees as Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels. And if after the First World War, the revolution succeeded in Russia but not in Germany was because the spread of revolutionary fervor, which struck with great force in the past, it was necessary but not sufficient to ensure the triumph of the revolution, which was expressly recognized by Rosa Luxemburg on one of his brilliant operations a few months before his foul murder. In other words, the insurgency is Libya stage was undoubtedly stimulated by the great popular victories in Tunisia and Egypt, but nothing would have happened had it not been the ravages of two decades of neoliberalism occurred in a rich country but in which the classes are just a few crumbs of the colossal oil revenues, young people lack of job prospects and the general crisis of capitalism emigration closed out until a few years ago removed the system pressure to step uplifting Extremely food prices. Finally, the rate of infant mortality, to discuss a very sensitive indicator for measuring the level of welfare of a population fluctuates according to a variety of sources between 20 and 25 per thousand, ie about four or five times higher which is recorded in Cuba and about double that of Brazil.



The same is true about the possibility that what is happening in Libya as agents of imperialism. But how can we forget that until the outbreak of revolution in Tunisia Kadafi was praised by the heads of state of the "capitalist democracies" as a ruling that had stripped their old obsessions, reconciled with neoliberal globalization and made peace with their former enemies from the White House to the Israeli racist regime? However, when they realized that his throne was shaky and felt that Gaddafi could suffer the same fate as their counterparts in Tunisia and Egypt imperialists quickly modified his stance to agree that Libya was not a democracy and that in this country respected the human rights-which they were never worried in the slightest, and demonstrating an unparalleled cynicism placed loud "side of the people" and against the ruling until yesterday suddenly converted reasonable in unacceptable tyrant. But, again, the work of these agents of imperialism could never have triggered an insurrection as impressive as that of Libya, or Tunisia and Egypt, had there been no substantive conditions required for that, defying the repression, the masses go out into the street ready to overthrow the government. That is, as Lenin scored several of his writings, if they did not want below and above could no longer live as before. On the other hand, if the agents of imperialism have in their hands the ability to make and unmake revolutions would have to recognize that our struggle is doomed to failure beforehand. Fortunately not. Nor makes more sense to argue that were the "social networks (Facebook and Twitter) that provoked the revolt, cleverly orchestrated by the CIA and agents of imperialism. To rule out this hypothesis simply a single number: the most recent United Nations statistics Internet users in Libya are just 5.1 percent of the total population. That can hardly explain the massive character of the rebellion of the Arab world because in Egypt and Tunisia in Libya as well as Internet users are a tiny minority of the population. These "social networks" may serve to facilitate communication among activists, but can not trigger the insurgency of the masses, the vast majority never had a computer at your fingertips.



Kadafi and neoliberalism, from yesterday to today.



At this point one must ask who is Kadafi and what it represents. Navarro Vicenc clearly illustrates the contrast between Kadafi "Nasser" in its early years and what is now "a vastly corrupt and repressive dictator." (7) According to Navarro, in 1969 and just 27 years old Colonel Kadafi led a coup inspired by the experience of Nasser in Egypt and overthrew the monarchy imposed by the British Empire after World War II. During those Kadafi early launched an agrarian reform, nationalized the oil and more than two hundred companies (which were reorganized with significant worker participation in management) to step to introduce some improvements in the quality and coverage of health and education. A strong state intervention and nationalization of credit were other features of the policies of those years. "Gaddafi had that experience," Navarro writes "as the third way between capitalism and socialism, then associated to the Soviet Union." (8) Now, that's the Kadafi that persists in the minds of large sections of the left American. The problem is that this is a totally outdated, because from the nineties the Libyan regime shift that starts a few years later, would put the country at odds with where he was in the seventies. The third way degenerated into a "popular capitalism"-the slogan playing late in the eighties made by Margaret Thatcher in the United Kingdom, and nationalizations began to be reversed by a corrupt privatization and opening festival of foreign capital that affected oil industry and the most important branches of the economy. Make no mistake: Gaddafi not only Nasser Mubarak. A keen observer of the scene Maghreb, Ayman El-Kayman, described with precise outlines the itinerary of this involution "(H) ace nearly ten years, Gadhafi has ceased to be for the democratic West unwise individual: that will be taken off the U.S. list of terrorist states recognized the responsibility for the Lockerbie bombing, to normalize its relations with the United Kingdom, gave the names of all Irish republicans who had trained in Libya to normalize the United States, gave all the information had over the Libyans suspected of involvement in jihad with Bin Laden and renounced their 'weapons of mass destruction', as well to call on Syria to do likewise, to normalize relations with the European Union, became the guardian of the concentration camps, where inmates are thousands of Africans bound for Europe, to normalize its relations with its sinister neighbor Ben Ali , gave opponents refugees in Libya. " (9) And when the people of Tunisia and Egypt revolted, Kadafi was aligned with their tormentors, in this position coinciding with the first reactions of the leaders of the "Western democracies" with Obama, Sarkozy, Cameron, Berlusconi, Zapatero and Netanyahu's genocidal regime. But they, seeing that popular uprisings were headed a historic victory in a few weeks spent making calls to his thugs cautious regional constraints to grant a few cosmetic reforms with urgently require them to leave power. When the fire reached Libya imperial bourgeoisie and its political representatives saw the opportunity to take advantage of the predictable collapse of preventing Qaddafi Libyan masses are those who take their future into their hands, whether through a "humanitarian intervention" that allows them to seize Libya on the pretext of stopping the bloodshed that the dictator promises to insurgents or, failing that, encourage your partition, or dismemberment, as they did in the former Yugoslavia and the like, unsuccessfully tried in Bolivia in 2008. As Lenin, Gramsci and repeatedly said Fidel right and the ruling classes, by his long experience in government, learn quickly and react with lightning speed to a situation like that today characterizes Libya. And if yesterday supported without regard to Kadafi now trying to get rid of him as soon as possible and facilitate an "orderly transition", Hillary Clinton dixit, organized by the betrayal of the expectations of the masses and introduce a sham democracy to allow the imperialists to continue bleeding Libya and the Arab world in general.



In its hasty conversion to neoliberalism Gaddafi opened the economy to the big companies, mainly European. In a detailed note Modesto Emilio Guerrero noted that since 1999 the West began to have treated it very special for three reasons that sound like heavenly music in the pockets of the bourgeoisie (10): (a) is a very good customer (b) is a good partner of its business, (c) is also a strategic supplier of oil and gas. Good customer because when it lifted the arms embargo on Libya weighed (in October 1999) for their participation, or complicity in "terrorist acts in various countries, Spain, Italy, England and Germany became the main arms suppliers then used Kadafi against his own people. Shortly after some 150 British companies linked to the oil business, including British Petroleum, paramount responsibility for the destruction of the marine ecosystem in the Gulf of Mexico and settled in Libya along with Repsol, France's Total, the Italian company ENI and OM Austrian business to exploit the oil. Other companies, these same countries and the United States actively participated in infrastructure apart from the aforementioned sale of weapons. Good partner, too, because through the 65,000 million dollars available to the Libyan Investment Authority made the family Kadafi significant investment in Fiat, the Italian oil company ENI and is a shareholder of Unicredit, the largest bank in Italy. (11) also holds shares in the economic group Pearsons, editor of the ultra-neoliberal Financial Times. Several major French and German companies also have the participation of Libyan capital. Insurance provider, finally, because, as stated by Silvio Berlusconi, the control of migratory flows "illegal" from the Maghreb and, more generally, throughout Africa, and the reliable supply of Libyan oil are extremely important services that leaders capitalist democracies, but could not fully appreciate worth. The President of the English government, José M. Aznar, his successor, Zapatero and the king himself Juan Carlos of Spain competed with "Il Cavaliere" Italian and British prime minister and leading figure of "new work" to cultivate the friendship of the Libyan leader, often with touches of shocking. (12 ) In line with these changes the relationship with Washington experienced a 180 degree turn: in 2006 the State Department removed Libya from the list of countries supporting terrorism. Frightened by the Gulf War in February 1991 and terrorized by contemplating what happened in Iraq since 2003 and the destination run by Saddam Hussein, Kadafi remorse over reacted to an extent that exceeded the ridiculous to declare time and again its willingness to adjust the behavior of Libya to the rules of the game imposed by imperialism. It was because of this that in 2008 former Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice could declare that "Libya and the United States share permanent interests: cooperation in the fight against terrorism, trade, nuclear proliferation, Africa, human rights and democracy. "(13)" Given all that we might then ask: Is this the pan-Arab socialism, advocated in the Green Paper the self-proclaimed "leader and guide of the revolution"? Is this policy to do the Libyan "state of the masses ", as Qadhafi defined his political organization? Is Kadafi Maghreb counterpart Chavez and Fidel? What is about this regime emancipatory processes underway in Latin America, to say nothing of the Cuban revolution?



What to do?



What should then make the Latin American left? First, all expressed clear condemnation of the savage repression that Kadafi is perpetrating against their own people. Solidarity, under any circumstances, with whom he engages in such a crime would irreparably harm the moral integrity and credibility of the left Our America. The recognition of the justice and legitimacy of popular protests, as was done without hesitation in the cases of Tunisia and Egypt, has only one possible corollary: the alignment of our people with the revolutionary process underway in the Arab world. Of course, the way this is manifested not be equal in the case of political and social movements, on the other hand, leftist governments in Latin America, who must necessarily include aspects and commitments of various kinds which not exist in those. But considering the always complex and often treacherous "reasons of state" and the contradictions of the "real politik "can not lead to the latter so far as to support a beleaguered dictator by the mobilization and the struggle of his own people, repressed and abused while the family of Kadafi and the narrow circle of its fans are enriched to levels unimaginable. How to explain to the Arab masses, which for decades sought the keys to his emancipacipon in the struggles of our people and recognize the Che, Fidel and Chavez the personification of his libertarian ideals and democratic government indecision most advanced Latin America while all the imperialist villain from Obama on down, are aligned even hypocritically, to their side?



Second, it is necessary to denounce and repudiate the plans of U.S. imperialism and its servants in Europe. And organize solidarity with the new gobernos arising from Arab insurgency. The rebels themselves have issued statements Libyan very clear about it: if the U.S. invasion, with or without the (unlikely) coverage of NATO, the rebels turn their guns against the invaders and then settle accounts with Kadafi, primarily responsible for Libya's submission to the dictates of the imperialist powers. Latin America has to support all forces of resistance to imperialist invasion possible, aware that what is now is playing in North Africa and the Middle East is not a local problem but a decisive battle in the long war against imperialist domination worldwide. The triumph of the popular uprising in Libya will correlate the strengthening of the ongoing rebellion in Yemen, Morocco, Jordan, Algeria, Barheim and that has long been brewing in Saudi Arabia, in addition to strengthening the resistance of unions and social movements in Wisconsin, United States, and in several European countries, the IMF now preferred victims. Barheim is the headquarters of the U.S. Fifth Fleet, with a mission to monitor everything that happens in the Persian Gulf and its surroundings, and Saudi Arabia a system totally subservient to the will of the White House and the great regulator of the international oil prices and adequate supplies to the developed world. If the socio-political map of the Arab world will change, as we hope so, the international geopolitics would be altered the balance of power in favor of the oppressed peoples and nations. And Latin America, which since the late twentieth century was placed at the forefront of the anti-imperialist, would at last found the allies he needs in other regions of the global South to move forward in their struggle for national self-determination, social justice and democracy. Therefore, our region can not have the right to be wrong with a process whose projections can be even higher than that at the time was the collapse of the Soviet Union, and a different symbol, and whose outcome will strengthen revolutionary emancipatory processes underway in our region. Abandon our Arab brothers in this decisive battle would be an unforgivable mistake, both ethically and from the more specifically political. It would betray the internationalism of Che and Fidel and archive, perhaps permanently, Bolivarian ideals. We can not lose this opportunity. ________________







"I see hypocritical call to when peace comes from countries that make war "in Cubadebate, March 4, 2011.

This episode was recounted in an interview that the author of these lines will do to David Harvey, in September 2010. The interview will be posted to the web and will be available in about a week, on cable

www.atilioboron.com ANSA, February 25, 2011.

On this question see. Raul Bracho, "What if everything is a lie?" On Kaos on the net, March 3, also insert the commands 2011.Y Russia Today, "Russian army says airstrikes against demonstrators in Libya never happened" in the network Kaos , March 4, 2011. Satellite monitoring of the forces Russian military found no evidence of aerial bombardment on demonstrators in Benghazi and Tripoli on 22 February. But days later, they were absent in the vicinity of the oil and military installations east of the country, as recognized Saif Al-Islam Gaddafi the news network Al Jazeera. According to the Libyan leader's son, was bombed sites where there were no civilians or demonstrators. Inthe aforementioned interview admitted that Libyan security forces had been punished by military weapons to the insurgents.

Alma Santiago Alba Rico and Allende, "What about Libya? The Arab world to Latin America, "in Rebellion, February 24 2011.

The literature on structural genesis of the ongoing revolution in the Arab world is growing exponentially every day. See, among others, James Petras, "The roots of the Arab revolt and premature celebrations" in Rebellion, March 6, 2011 and Ignacio Ramonet, "Five causes of the Arab revolution" in http://www.monde- diplomatique.es /? url = editorial/0000856412872168186811102294251000/editorial /? article = 8ca803e0-5eba-4c95-908f-64a36ee042fd

Vicenc Navarro, "Gaddafi, Neoliberalism, the IMF and governments are supposed defenders of human rights", in Rebellion , March 2, 2011.

Ibid.

Alba Rico and Allende, op.cit. Modesto

Guerrero, "From the indefensible Gaddafi Arab rebellions" in Rebellion, March 1, 2011. Http://vocearancio.ingdirect.it/?p=18768



View On Tony Blair, see "Day the LSE STI sold soul to Libya", in Daily Mail (London), March 5, 2011, pp. Reproduced in
6-7
Alba Rico and Alma Allende, op. Cit.

Rebellion has posted this article with the author's permission through a license from Creative Commons, respecting their freedom to publish it elsewhere.

Pirates Of The Caribbean Jesse Jane

NATO, war, lies and businesses

As some know, in September 1969, Muammar al-Gaddafi, a Bedouin Arab military peculiar character and inspired by the ideas of Egyptian leader Gamal Abdel Nasser, promoted within the armed forces a movement that overthrew King Idris I of Libya, a desert country near fully and sparsely populated north of Africa, Tunisia and Egypt. some important and valuable energy resources of Libya were discovered gradually.
Born into a family of the Bedouin tribe of nomadic herdsmen of the desert, in the region of Tripoli, Gaddafi was deeply anti-colonialist. Ensures that a paternal grandfather died fighting against the Italian invaders when Libya was invaded by them in 1911. Colonial rule and fascism changed the lives of everyone. It is said also that the father was imprisoned before earning a living as a factory worker.
Even Gaddafi's opponents say they are noted for their intelligence as a student, was expelled from high school for their activities antimonarchist. Managed to enroll in another high school and later graduated in law at the University of Benghazi at age 21. Then entered the Military Academy in Benghazi where he created what was called the Secret Unionist Movement of Free Officers, later concluding his studies at a British military academy.
This background explains the remarkable influence exerted after Libya and other political leaders are today in favor or against Gaddafi.
had started his political life with facts unquestionably revolutionary.
In March 1970, after mass demonstrations nationalists, managed the evacuation of British troops in the country and in June, the United States ousted the large air base near Tripoli handed over to Egyptian military trainers, allied country to Libya.
In 1970, several Western oil companies and banking companies with foreign capital participation were affected by the Revolution. In late 1971, the famous British Petroleum met the same fate. In the agricultural area all Italian goods were confiscated, the settlers and their descendants expelled from Libya.
State intervention was directed at the control of big business. The production of this country went to enjoy one of the highest levels of the Arab world. Was banned gambling and alcohol consumption. The legal status of women, traditionally limited, was high.
Libyan leader theories became involved in extremist who opposed both communism and capitalism. It was a stage in which Gaddafi is devoted to the theory, it makes no sense to include in this analysis, although it noted that in the first article of the Proclamation Constitution of 1969 established the "social" character of the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya.
What I want to emphasize is that the United States and its NATO allies never cared for human rights.
The madhouse that took place in the Security Council at the meeting of the Human Rights Council in Geneva, and the UN General Assembly in New York, was pure theater.
fully understand the reactions of the political leaders involved in so many contradictions and sterile debates, given the web of interests and issues to be addressed.
all know very well that the permanent membership, veto power, the possession of nuclear weapons and not a few institutions are sources of privileges and interests imposed by force of humanity. It may or may not agree with many of them, but never accept them as fair or ethical action.
The rule is now trying to spin the events surrounding what he did or not Gaddafi, because you need to intervene militarily in Libya and hit the revolutionary wave that began in the Arab world. So far, no one said a word, was silent and did business. Promoted
latent rebellion by Libyan intelligence agencies Yankee, or the errors of the Gaddafi, it is important that people do not be fooled, because very soon the world opinion will have sufficient information to know what to expect.
In my opinion, so I stated right from the start, had to denounce NATO's bellicose plans.
Libya, like many Third World countries, is a member of the Non-Aligned Movement, Group 77 and other international organizations, through which relationships are established regardless of their economic and social system.
Broadly speaking, the revolution in Cuba, inspired by Marxist-Leninist principles and Marti, had triumphed in 1959 to 90 miles from the U.S., we imposed the Platt Amendment and was the owner of the economy of our country.
Almost immediately, the empire brought against our pueblo la guerra sucia, las bandas contrarrevolucionarias, el criminal bloqueo económico, y la invasión mercenaria de Girón, custodiada por un portaaviones y su infantería de marina lista para desembarcar si la fuerza mercenaria obtenía determinados objetivos.
Apenas año y medio después nos amenazó con el poderío de su arsenal nuclear. Una guerra de ese carácter estuvo a punto de estallar.
Todos los países latinoamericanos, con la excepción de México, participaron del criminal bloqueo que todavía perdura, sin que nuestro país jamás se rindiera. Es importante recordarlo para los que carecen de memoria histórica.
En enero de 1986, esgrimiendo la idea de que Libia estaba behind the so-called revolutionary terrorism, Reagan ordered breaking economic and trade relations with that country.
In March, a force of aircraft carriers in the Gulf of Sirte, in Libya considered national waters, unleashed attacks that resulted in the destruction of several naval units equipped with missile and radar systems that country's coast in the USSR had acquired .
On 5 April, a West Berlin discotheque frequented by U.S. soldiers, was the victim of plastic explosives, in which three people died, including two U.S. soldiers and many were wounded. Reagan
Gaddafi accused and ordered the Air Force would response. Three squadrons took off from aircraft carriers of the Sixth Fleet and bases in the UK, with missiles and bombs attacked seven military targets in Tripoli and Benghazi. About 40 people were killed, including 15 civilians. Noted the progress of the bombers, Gaddafi met the family and was leaving his home in the military complex of Bab Al Aziziya, south of the capital. No evacuation had been completed when a missile hit on the spot, his daughter Hanna was killed and two injured children. The fact was widely rejected, the UN General Assembly adopted a resolution condemning the violation of UN Charter and International Law. Just made in terms energetic the Non-Aligned Movement, the Arab League and the OAU.
On December 21, 1988, a Boeing 747 from Pan Am flying from London to New York disintegrated in midair by a bomb blast, debris fell on the town of Lockerbie, and the tragedy took 270 lives of 21 nationalities.
At first, the U.S. Government was suspicious of Iran, in retaliation for the deaths of 290 people by the demolition of an Airbus of the state line. Investigations, as the Yankees, involving two Libyan intelligence agents. Similar allegations were made against Libya by a French airliner en route Brazzaville-N'Djamena-Paris, involving Gaddafi Libyan officials refused to extradite for acts which he categorically denied.
A dark legend was made against him involving the Reagan and Bush.
From 1975 until the final stage of the Reagan administration, Cuba had been devoted to their internationalist duty in Angola and other African countries. We knew of the conflicts that took place in Libya or around it for readings and testimonies of people closely linked to that country and the Arab world and by the impressions that keep numerous personalities from different countries with whom we had contacts in those years.
Many well-known African leaders with whom Gaddafi maintained close relations worked to find solutions to the strained relations between Libya and the United Kingdom.
The Security Council had imposed sanctions on Libya that began when Gaddafi agreed to be overcome to prosecute, under certain conditions, the two accused for the plane that exploded over Scotland.
delegations began to be invited Libyan border meetings. In July 1999, London began the restoration of full diplomatic relations with Libya, after some additional concessions.
In September of that year, European Union ministers agreed to repeal the restrictive trade measures taken in 1992.
On December 2, Massimo D'Alema, Italian Prime Minister, made the first visit by a European government leader to Libya.
Missing the USSR and the socialist camp in Europe, Gaddafi decided to accept the demands of U.S. and NATO.
When I visited Libya in May 2001 showed me the ruins of the treacherous attack that killed his daughter Reagan, and was about to exterminate the entire family.
In early 2002, the State Department reported that diplomatic talks were underway between the U.S. and Libya.
had returned in May to include Libya in the list of state sponsors of terrorism, although in January, President George W. Bush did not mention the African country in his famous speech on the members of the "axis of evil."
At the beginning of 2003, under the financial agreement reached between Libya on compensation and requesting countries, the United Kingdom and France, the Security Council of the UN lifted sanctions against Libya in 1992.
Before the end of 2003, Bush and Tony Blair reported an agreement with Libya, a country that had given intelligence experts from the United Kingdom and documentation of Washington's unconventional weapons programs and ballistic missiles with a range greater than 300 kilometers. Officials from both countries had already visited several facilities. It was the fruit of many months of talks between Tripoli and Washington, as Bush himself revealed. Gaddafi
its promises to disarm. Libya turned over a few months in the five units of Scud-C missiles with a range of 800 kilometers and hundreds of Scud-B, whose range exceeded the 300 km short-range missile defense.
From October 2002 began a marathon of visits to Tripoli: Berlusconi, in October 2002, José María Aznar, in September 2003, Berlusconi back in February, August and October 2004, Blair, in March 2004 , Germany's Schroeder, in October of that year Jacques Chirac in November 2004. Everybody happy. Mighty gentleman is Don Money. Gaddafi traveled
triumphantly Europe. He was welcomed in Brussels in April 2004 by Romano Prodi, president of the European Commission in August of that year, Libyan leader invited Bush to visit his country, Exxon Mobil, Chevron Texaco and Conoco Philips finalize the resumption of oil extraction through joint ventures.
In May 2006, the U.S. announced the withdrawal of Libya from the list of terrorist countries and the establishment of full diplomatic relations.
In 2006 and 2007, France and the United States signed agreements on nuclear cooperation for peaceful purposes, in May 2007, Blair returned to visit Gaddafi in Sirte. British Petroleum signed a "hugely important" as stated for the exploration of gas fields.
In December 2007, Gaddafi made two visits to France and signed contracts for civil and military equipment worth 10,000 million euros, and Spain, where he met with Prime Minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero. Million dollar contracts were signed with major NATO countries.
What has now caused the precipitous withdrawal of U.S. embassies and other members of NATO?
Everything is very strange. George W.
Bush, the father of the stupid war on terror, declared on 20 September 2001 at West Point Cadets "Our [...] security will require the military you will lead a force to be ready to strike notice in any dark corner of the world. And our security will require to be ready for preemptive action when necessary to defend our freedom and [...] our lives. "
" We must uncover terror cells in 60 countries or more [...] Together with our friends and allies, we must oppose proliferation and confront regimes that sponsor terrorism, as each case requires. "
What Obama think of that speech?
What sanctions imposed by the Security Council to which killed over a million of civilians in Iraq and every day men, women and children killed in Afghanistan, where in recent days, angry people took to the streets to protest the killing of innocent children?
An AFP dispatch from Kabul, dated today, March 9, rebels that: "Last year was the deadliest for civilians in nine years of war between the Taliban and international forces in Afghanistan, with nearly 2,800 dead 15% more than in 2009, said Wednesday a UN report, which highlights the human costs of conflict for the people. "
" ... the Taliban insurgency intensified and gained ground In recent years, with guerrilla actions beyond its traditional strongholds of the south and east. "
" With 2 777 exactly, the number of civilians killed in 2010 increased by 15% compared to 2009, said the joint annual report Assistance Mission to the United Nations in Afghanistan ... "
" President Barack Obama said on March 3 "deep regret" the Afghan people for the nine children killed, and so did the U.S. general David Petraeus, commander in ISAF chief, and Defense Secretary Robert Gates. "
" ... the UNAMA report shows that the number of civilians killed in 2010 is four times higher than the international forces soldiers killed in combat in the same year.
"The year 2010 was, by far the deadliest year for foreign troops in nine years of war, with 711 dead, confirming that the guerrillas of the Taliban has intensified despite the sending of 30,000 U.S. troops last year booster .
For 10 days in Geneva and United Nations, delivered over 150 speeches on human rights violations were repeated millions of times on television, radio, Internet and print media.
The Minister of Foreign Affairs of Cuba, Bruno Rodriguez, in his speech past March 1, 2011 to the Foreign Ministers meeting in Geneva, said:
"Human consciousness rejects the killing of innocent people under any circumstances, anywhere. Cuba fully shares the global concern for the loss of civilian lives in Libya and you want your people to achieve a peaceful and sovereign civil war happening there, without any foreign interference and to ensure the integrity of this nation. "
Some of the closing paragraphs of his speech was terse:
"If the essential human right is the right to life, you will be ready by the Council to suspend the membership of the States untie a war? "
" Suspend to States to fund and provide military aid used by the receiving State in massive, flagrant and systematic human rights and attacks against civilians, such as those occurring in Palestine?
"Apply this action against powerful countries conducting executions in the territory of other States to use high technology such as smart munitions and unmanned aerial vehicles?
"What will happen to States to accept in their territories illegal secret prisons, to facilitate the transit of secret flights with hostages or engage in acts of torture?"
fully share the courageous stand of Venezuelan leader Hugo Chavez and the Bolivarian. We
internal war against Libya, in favor of immediate peace and full respect for the lives and rights of all citizens, without foreign intervention, which only serve to prolong the conflict and the interests of NATO. Fidel Castro Ruz

March 9, 2011

9 and 35 pm

Ovulation Calculator March Dimes

Huesca Huesca Betis president Gordon

I want to echo this event, I'm not going to miss. The truth is that I was amazed at Jesus one day at his home in Pamplona with that piece of instrument that took up half the room. The name sorry for the ignorance but I do not remember if it was a marimba, or as it is the correct name, one of those going. And I was surprised instrument itself, but when playing Jesus ... And what was my surprise that a couple of performances of the last edition of the Southern Pyrenees had such virtuoso percussion instruments, from this summer between one thing and another I am a fan, I LIKE. So I would advise this envento assistance, we are there.

Saturday 19 March at 18.30h,

Escartín Civic Center Santiago, Huesca
(Free Entry)

DER

Provokateur

PART:

TIMBALES
MARCH • E. Vibraphone

CARTER

AccuLean • V. BOX

BLANES

TCHIK; pour Caisse Claire • N.

MARTYNCIOW

PART TWO:

ELECTRONIC STUDY DIRECTOR + No1, for Conductor and Electronic Sounds • J. Prades CAVERO

ELECTRONIC CASH + RO. DE. O • RC CONSTABLE

SET UP & ELECTRONICS • HW HENZE PRISON SONG ENSEMBLE

4 '33''• J. I

CAGE MOVEMENT MOVEMENT MOVEMENT II III

SNARE ELECTRONIC CASH + DRAMA • B. JOHNSTON

Physics Games Unblocked

This March 8th women remember a fighter and still largely unrecognized.

was a woman lonco of Mapuche-Pehuenche. Hueputan Lonco Wife, who died under torture by order of Governor Alonso de Sotomayor. His military training and leadership qualities, made him earn the support of the military strategists of his people. Sponsored by the lof and support of his brother Huechuntureo, was appointed in charge of troops in the region. In a period of great intensity of the actions of war, attacked the fortress in Nahuelbuta Puchunqui and after several battles during the year 1587, defeated the invading troops, with the participation of Mapuche groups puelches. Tired of the war he retired to the south to land near Villarica (VoIP), where he disappeared without a trace. Secondary Text

Dysautonomia Forums For Men

Women in the March 8: A Century in motion. " Claudia Korol

By Claudia Korol .- There are different versions about the origin of 8 March as International Women's Day. In what all agree is that the date appears as such from the initiative presented by Clara Zetkin in the II th International Conference of Socialist Women held in Copenhagen on 26 and 27 August 1910. Clara Zetkin based its proposal on the willingness to follow the example of American socialist women, that since the late nineteenth century were carrying out important struggles as workers, had been held for the first time the Women's Day in Chicago, May 3 1908, involving 1500 women.

Clara Zetkin and Rosa Luxemburg were two intelligent and active precursors of the struggles of women, and effort that they have an place in the forefront of global emancipation movement.
few months later, on March 19, 1911, was first celebrated the International Women's Day, with mass rallies in Germany (involving more than one million women), Austria, Denmark and Sweden. Demanded the right to vote of women, to hold public office, the right to work, vocational education, at the end of discrimination at work, at the end of sexual exploitation.
The Russian Revolution left a new mark on those days. On February 23, 1917 as the Russian calendar (8 March in the Gregorian calendar), women rebelled, triggering the revolutionary process would have its peak in October of that year. He wrote about the Russian revolutionary leader Alexandra Kollontai, "The day of the workers, the March 8, 1917 - was a memorable date in history. The February revolution had begun." One hundred years later



marks a century of the first international act of vindication of the rights of women, which was also the struggle for peace against imperialist war and the affirmation of a socialist perspective.
If the origins of the 20 th century, the emancipation movement mobilized women found in struggle, "awakening" and "participating" discussing their roles in patriarchal societies, and were also left-son-carriers of these marks, in the early 21 collect the fruits of many battles, from extending the scope of rights at all levels. The right to vote for women was widespread, and now not only participates in the vote, but women have gained in specific areas the political and social development. This has also taught the biological condition is not enough to be carriers of a culture change, since in many cases, women reproduce patriarchal logic, and are associated with these models of power to legitimize their role.
In the field of economic and social rights and the right to decide on our bodies, there has been progress in public policy.
However, these achievements have to contrast the subordination of many women who suffer in their daily life conditions of oppression and violence.
In the case of Latin America, capitalism, patriarchy and colonialism, have been historically established simultaneously, bearing the mark of conquest. So when it looks at violence against women, we must look at the history of impunity and to refer to the first foundational facts of capitalism on the continent: the "settlers" are appropriated to territories the same time, wealth, bodies of indigenous women and black slaves. And still do, as part of the recolonization of these lands. In recent years, the commodification of all aspects of life also increased the commodification of women's bodies.

The feminization of resistance

At the recent World Social Forum held in Dakar, Senegal, between 6 and 11 February, feminist and anti-globalization movement was found with thousands of women who have struggled in different parts of the world and in particular on the continent in those days began to roar in the squares and streets in mass revolt that ended with the Mubarak regime and continues to spread like wildfire to other countries. They were moving the voices and the presence of African women, who have shown their decision to be in the streets, fighting authoritarianism, and religious fundamentalism.
also heard the voices of women from other continents. After 10 years of existence of this event-summit struggles against globalization, for the first time attention was called from old Europe, wracked by the impact of the crisis of capitalism at home. They were not only allegations of abuse that migrant women face daily. Also heard the voices of feminist activists and labor leaders, as the Italian union Alessandra Mecozzi, who analyzed in a table how it impacts on the lives of women, the crisis in his country: "The economic and social crisis in our country and in Europe is very strong, because the attack of capitalism and neoliberal policies, multinational corporations against workers is very large. In our country, the country of the Vatican, there is also a general regression in culture, the image of women. A new use of the woman's body, and the relationship between the body and money, which is horrible. It is a very masculine model that is gaining strength, also for the role of the media. But women are fighting with great force, demanding social role and changing government policies. "
Days after the Forum, more than a million women took to the streets and squares of Italy demanding the resignation of Silvio Berlusconi, accused of child prostitution, corruption, abuse of authority ... Berlusconi reacted by dismissing as "subversive" women who marched in defense of dignity. Argentina feminist philosopher notes Maffía Diana: "Of course, feminism is subversive, because it distorts the hierarchical relations of gender. There is a slogan in feminism: "The personal is political. " This means on one side than on interpersonal relationships, home, love, there are relations of power. The other aspect is how staff are in the public world, seemingly open to all, democratic equality. When women are encouraged that world are "prostitutes", ie women who are available to any man, because they are restricted to be privatized body of a man in particular. We're talking about commercial use of women's bodies, including the purchase of women's sexuality. The transformation of a body into a commodity is the limit of slavery, but also the limit of contract sexuality. Is someone who puts his body and sexuality, and another that makes money. When that money is controlled in a dramatic percentage of males-United Nations says women are only 2% of global production facilities, including land, we can analyze how economic resources are concentrated in male hands and see also in terms of sexuality is a financial and emotional surplus value on women's bodies. Not only with prostitution. Also with the housework. Trapping the bodies of women in decisions of men. Their bodies are expropriated. "
Under the Social Forum Globally, women of Via Campesina International Peasant movements-articulation of the world-used the space to launch the campaign against violence towards women and children. Via Campesina points in his speech: "We can not remain silent! To look away and remain silent We share responsibility for this violence. To mobilize against, contribute to poverty eradication and building a society based on equality and justice. Violence against women, whether occurring at work and in our organizations, within the same household or community is also an issue of farmers' organizations.. " Situations
of violence against people and against women were reported also from Latin America. Honduran singer-songwriter Karla Lara, a member of Feminists in resistance, noted in one of the tables: "While we can not reverse the coup, knowing we are free has been a triumph that no one is going to take away. ... Resist a regime that protects landowners murderers, against the repeal of section 18-02 which granted land titling. Resist a fundamentalist regime, homophobic that has killed more than 25 colleagues in the gay community, which together with the movement lesbian, transvestite and transsexual, unite and work in Diversity Collective Sexual. ... Resist the threat of reverse frequency permits granted and the decision to deny any new permits for short-range radio, community radio alternatives. Resist a regime that is killing people who have direct or indirect link with the National Front. Resist the body, leaving aside the fear, putting his face, words and our days ... RESIST in our fight to place the problem of femicide in the category of political problem that is, to make them visible on the national agenda and to permeate FNRP structures as such. Resist the policy of impunity, creating a real Committee Verdad. RESISTIMOS a la militarización del país, la instalación de las bases gringas, la aprobación de una Ley Antiterrorista, que legitima las acciones criminales del terrorismo de Estado. Las feministas hacemos RESISTENCIA al sistema patriarcal y frente a nuestros propios compañeros y compañeros. Damos la lucha porque se entienda que el feminismo es una propuesta política en la búsqueda de igualdad de oportunidades entre mujeres y hombres, y para que la visión anticapitalista se una a la visión antipatriarcal y antirracista. Para que en función de la lucha de clases, no se crea necesario postergar la agenda de derechos sexuales, reproductivos, de valoración y visibilización de nuestro aporte. Resistimos frente the belief that patriarchy also slipped in the bones and the minds of those who make the resistance. Because feminism is no longer enough knows that the speech of a better society when little or nothing of our lives as a couple, with our daughters and sons, our fathers and mothers with a radical change in the look of women as second-class subject. So feminism looks back to the land, the ancestors, nature. Find a way of life consistent with the philosophy of good living that since indigenous peoples are proposed. .. But not only resist: we're walking towards the reestablishment of Honduras, inventing the paths to a Constituent popular, feminist, antiracist made by and for all. And while in Honduras women and men in resistance continue claiming that the current regime is the continuation of the coup and to stand firm on not recognizing the current regime. " Other Forums



these days is meeting in Buenos Aires, the seminar "Making Peace in Colombia" driven by Latin American / as for peace, joint spaces that have among their most important drivers to the former Colombian Senator Piedad Córdoba , one of the bravest women in the battle for peace in his country, costing him a tremendous political persecution and media campaigns to discredit.
Speaking Stop pointing with Piedad Córdoba: "No time is not conducive to work for peace in a country that has 60 years of war. Many years ago was not an event of this nature, where the guerrillas took the decision to participate, clearly and openly. In this seminar we hope to take a series of conclusions that are generating a scenario for the peace agreement in Colombia, a scenario of humanization of war, for example no more false positives, the situation of political prisoners in prisons, displacement of thousands of people, the disappearance of men and women, and the discussion of issues such as prisoners of war. The purpose of this meeting is the consolidation of grassroots peace movement, and we want to contribute to the construction of a political agenda that seeks to achieve peace in Colombia with social justice. Is the construction of an international agenda for the recognition of our civil war, the interests at stake, the ethical, political, economic, environmental and humanistic peace. Do not open the doors of peace, is condemned to barbarism. It is an apocalyptic interpretation. Is the result of what we see when we find the rural country. When all regions of the country, come the testimonies of the population on human rights violations. "

The words and deeds of piety, are in the frame of a genealogy of women who have managed to entangle their lives in the battles for peace, against all oppression, and the complete emancipation of the bodies and looted by the territories capitalism, patriarchy, colonialism.
A century after the first celebration of International Women's Day, we will have new reasons for hope, for rebellion, for dignity. Women, many recognized, and many more anonymous, we are creating opportunities to bring the revolution and joy to unleash pain and centuries of injustice, to re feminism from below, from memory, and from walking of our people.